Agreed. I think almost every article I've seen that talk about
openstack dying has come from people with stakes in either VMWare or one
of the major cloud providers, even if not directly (e.g. they're a
solutions provider for relevant parties)
My understanding from folks who deal with it is that openstack is
quirky, and still far from being "user friendly", but it does actually
work and does solve problems for them, without the huge cost of VMWare
licences for environments on their scale. (scale being an important
factor here, no doubt)
On 05/17/15 10:56, [email protected] wrote:
Openstack solves a specific problem, a problem that not everyone has in their
infrastructure. Saying it will die is like saying mainframes (or their
equivalent) died out years ago. As long as that problem space exists so to will
the tools.
On May 17, 2015, at 10:26, Matt Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:
I've heard from multiple people, who I respect greatly, that OpenStack is going
to die off, but I just don't see it. The modern IT infrastructure is heavily
populated with products and technologies that were a really bad idea in their
original release. So, while I think OpenStack has some serious problems, I
think it is going to be around for quite a while.
I would like to hear what a number of other folks who I respect think.
-- Matt
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
