On 28/03/17 05:32, Ed Warnicke wrote: > Anil, > > Thats nice... but at the end of the day, here's the net-net... a large > subset of the world's first experience trying to do ODL development is > going to be that we are inexplicably broken in a cryptic way. I > strongly recommend we get a cert that is supported by *any* Oracle JDK > 1.8, and wait for Oracle JDK 1.8 to be deprecated for use for ODL > development (typically something that happens after 1.8 itself has > EOLed) *before* using a Let's Encrypt Cert. > > Initial exposure matters tremendously, and a first experience of "It's > broken" is not what we want.
Understood, but then again we have always recommended using latest released JDKs for ODL and cannot realistically support anything but that, as most of our developers keep these uptodate (it is a good idea from security perspective). Maybe we need to feature the guidance of 'make sure your JDK is the latest one released in a supported train' more prominently? Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
