Hello, everyone! I got some responses on your feedback from Bitergia. I am also adding them to this thread so that you and they can respond to each other directly. I am pasting below their response to my email.
On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 11:39 -0400, Casey Cain wrote: > Hi, Everyone. > > Here is some quick feedback / support questions from our community: Thanks a lot for taking care of channeling this feedback. First of all, maybe we should schedule already the training sessions about the dashboard, which we offer for free. I'm sending a separate message about that. WRT your comments, see below, inlined. > Bitergia does not filter out commits for submodule updates. So folks > who contribute to a project that is a submodule of autorelease or > docs will potentially get between 2x and 3x the number of commits in > their results counted. Can we get this fixed along with making sure How are "commits for submodule updates" different from others? > merges are not counted as commits? Merges are not counted as commits if the "Empty Commits" filter is applied, as it is by default in the Git panel, see https://opendaylight.biterg.io/app/kibana#/dashboard/Git > @inocybe.ca and @inocybe.com do not appear to be an "organization in > Bitergia so all contributions go to Unknown. Can this please be > fixed. This means that @inocybe.ca and @inocybe.com addresses should be assigned to "Inocybe"? > Robert Varga stated: > "One thing I have concern about is the company break-down, where my > commits are attributed to Cisco only, whereas they should be > attributed > based on the email address: > - [email protected] -> Cisco > - *varga@pantheon* -> Pantheon Technologies > - [email protected] -> unaffiliated Currently, we support "sequential affiliations" for these cases. Since addresses are not usually reliable (eg, people start committing for a company with their old personal address), we use dates to determine periods of affiliation. If Robert can provide us with the periods of affiliation for Cisco, Pantheon Technologies, and unaffiliated, we can include that information for his profile. > The second thing is that pantheon.sk and pantheon.tech addresses seem > to > be lumped into the 'Unknown' category -- which is very visible in the > topoprocessing repository. > What can I do to remedy these?" Can we assume that we should assign pantheon.sk and pantheon.tech to "Pantheon Technologies"? Best, Casey On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Thanh Ha <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/05/17 13:52, Thanh Ha wrote: >> > In case folks are wondering why Bitergia's commit numbers are higher >> > than Spectrometer. It's because Bitergia does not filter out commits for >> > submodule updates. So folks who contribute to a project that is a >> > submodule of *autorelease* or *docs* will potentially get between 2x and >> > 3x the number of commits in their results counted. >> >> That sounds like something that should be fixed (along with making sure >> merges are not counted as commits) -- otherwise the numbers are not >> saying much. >> > > Agreed. Merges also inflate the numbers which Spectrometer filtered out as > well. > > Thanh > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > -- Casey Cain Technical Program Manager Linux Foundation _________________ IRC - CaseyODL Skype - wrathwolfk WeChat - okaru6
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
