On 11/05/17 21:18, Casey Cain wrote: > Hello, everyone! Hello Casey,
>> Robert Varga stated: >> "One thing I have concern about is the company break-down, where my >> commits are attributed to Cisco only, whereas they should be >> attributed >> based on the email address: >> - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> -> Cisco >> - *varga@pantheon* -> Pantheon Technologies >> - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> -> unaffiliated > > Currently, we support "sequential affiliations" for these cases. Since > addresses are not usually reliable (eg, people start committing for a > company with their old personal address), we use dates to determine > periods of affiliation. If Robert can provide us with the periods of > affiliation for Cisco, Pantheon Technologies, and unaffiliated, we can > include that information for his profile. I am sorry, that will not work, as the periods are overlapping. I think the classification rules are simple enough: - check against known company emails, if not matched then - look up in sequential affiliations, if not matched then - attribute to 'Unknown' This will provide accurate results for both cases as long as company email addresses can be trusted. If that assumption does not hold, I am afraid we have a larger issue (and a separate topic). I also think we should have a separate 'Individual' category, distinct from 'Unknown'. >> The second thing is that pantheon.sk <http://pantheon.sk> and > pantheon.tech addresses seem >> to >> be lumped into the 'Unknown' category -- which is very visible in the >> topoprocessing repository. >> What can I do to remedy these?" > > Can we assume that we should assign pantheon.sk <http://pantheon.sk> and > pantheon.tech to > "Pantheon Technologies"? Yes. Furthermore, I think these should be clarified for all member companies ASAP. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
