I'd not go so far as to create a list yet -- I'm not sure we know what we're all looking for at this point.
For example: do we really want "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", or perhaps more generally "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? To my mind, these are two related-but-different, and equally-interesting, ideas to explore... -mpg > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Becchi > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:15 AM > To: OSGeo Discussions > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development > > I guess this thread is pretty hot, there are many sub-threads > and maybe > a good solution could be to set up a mailing list, for the beginning, > as: ogc AT osgeo.org > Trying to be practical I can offer myself to administer the > list as I'm > doing with the Spanish Chapter and the Spanish GIS Book. > > There will be the possibility to define possible actions, > participation > to OGC meeting, support to OSGeo new standards (as for Tile Map > Service), creating or not a Committee ecc ecc. > I guess we can, as minimum target, set up a lobby of OSGeo > softwares to > promote effective interoperability of OGC standards. > > ciao > Lorenzo > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
