Lorenzo, Might I ask, what will a separate list accomplish that posting on just the main OSGeo list won't? Standards are a sufficiently important subject that all should be concerned with it, and definitely knowledgeable about.
Managing all these separate lists is becoming a pain in the derrière for me. I would rather see and participate in the standards discussion right here on the OSGeo discussion list. On 7/19/07, Lorenzo Becchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this list will be spammed even before starting... ) should we proceed creating the list? does anyone disagree? ciao Lorenzo Frank Warmerdam wrote: > Michael P. Gerlek wrote: >> I'd not go so far as to create a list yet -- I'm not sure we know what >> we're all looking for at this point. >> >> For example: do we really want "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", or perhaps more generally >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? To my mind, these are two related-but-different, >> and equally-interesting, ideas to explore... > > Michael, > > I think it should be a "standards" list, not an OGC list, even though > for practical purposes it will be mostly OGC standards. > > Best regards, _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ Nelson Inst. for Env. Studies, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org/education/ S&T Policy Fellow, National Academy of Sciences http://www.nas.edu/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- collaborate, communicate, compete ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
