Moskovitz, Bob ha scritto:
It would be great if geological symbols that can be found in http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/11A02 can be considered.
Well, no matter what the technical solution adopted is going to be, the key is that the site contents should be totally user driven, much alike wikipedia, not a set of symbols chosen by a committee. So the question about a symbol set being "considered" would not really stand up, if you'd care to point people to them you'd just have to register to the site and add a pointer to them or upload the symbols directly there if the license allows it. I know this would eventually mean some bad content gets into the site, and that's why peer ranking and item related discussions are important, if enough people get interested in the site (if we reach a critical mass) then good content will stand up by itself. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
