Jachym: +1. Another thing to consider is maintenance. How often should OSGeo
projects
be assessed for freshness and change in rating? Yearly? 2x/year?
Having said this adding projects should be more agile.
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:27:14 +0000
From: Jachym Cepicky <[email protected]>
To: Vaclav Petras <[email protected]>
Cc: OSGeo Discussions <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
Vašku,
just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have to
change their name.
My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and "projects"
and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating
system.
Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make it (or
similar)
Jachym
po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras <[email protected]>
napsal:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <[email protected]>
wrote:
former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but
you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
Hi Jachym,
do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs"
by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and
Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs,
although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is
ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo for
All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is now used more and more (well, the
linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title element).
Thanks for taking this into consideration,
Vaclav
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
