<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Guys,
I think you are trying to find a term for something, I would like to
get rid of. "OSGeo Project" is, what I would like to achieve for both
- today's projects and labs together under one hat.
Or anybody thinks completely different?
Just my $.02
J
čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Anand
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> napsal:
Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
Suchith
__________________________________________
From: Bart van den Eijnden [[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
http://incubator.apache.org <http://incubator.apache.org/>
Best regards,
Bart
On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Suchith Anand
<[email protected].__uk
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:Suchith.Anand@__
nottingham.ac.uk
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
Thanks Jeff.
Though we had lots of discussions afterwards and continuing on
this , we couldnt find any solution till now. So this might be a
good opportunity to modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to
something like "Community Projects" to avoid confusion if that is
acceptable to Vaclav, Jachym and others. Many thanks.
Well, I'm not particularly fond of "Community Projects" as a
name. Even mature FOSS projects are community projects in one way
or the other. Unfortunately, I don't have other suggestion.
Vaclav
Suchith
__________________________________________
From: [email protected].__org
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:discuss-bounces@__
lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:[email protected]>>
[[email protected].__org
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:discuss-bounces@__
lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:[email protected]>>] On Behalf Of Jeff
McKenna [[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>__<mailto:jmckenna@__
gatewaygeomatics.com
<mailto:[email protected]>>]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>__>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
(we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an
issue and discussed[1])
Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab' is in the GeoForAll
education network, maybe Jachym is correct that it is a good time to
modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community
Projects".
[1]
http://lists.osgeo.org/__pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-
__June/000134.html
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-
June/000134.html>
-jeff
On 2015-03-03 3:42 AM, Suchith Anand wrote:
> Vaclav,
>
> Please accept my sincere apologies as it was my mistake that i
did not think on this when we started the ICA-OSGeo Labs
initiative (so many things were going on at that time!).
>
> In universities, we generally use the "Labs" term to refer to
infrastructure/people/__facilities for a particular subject. For
example Botany Lab, Robotics Lab etc. And we wanted to make sure
there is a dedicated Open Source Geospatial Lab in universities
worldwide (which includes bringing together people from various
disciplines, infrastructure (the physical space) and facilities
to make this happen. Also it is easier to make use of the same
terminology/structure of "Labs" which is widely used in the
university environment to get academics start the initiative in
their respective universities (also it is easier for them to
convince their higher management on a structure that is known to
them than reinvent a new term for this) .
>
> So it will very helpful for us if you can make use of new
"OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating system for
the incubation as then there is no confusion in the future. Many
thanks for your consideration.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Suchith
>
> __________________________________________
> From: [email protected].__org
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:discuss-bounces@__
lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:[email protected]>>
[[email protected].__org
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:discuss-bounces@__
lists.osgeo.org
<mailto:[email protected]>>] On Behalf Of Jachym
Cepicky [[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.
__com
<mailto:[email protected]>>]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
> To: Vaclav Petras
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:[email protected].
__org
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>
> Vašku,
>
> just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative
"OSGeo-Labs" have to change their name.
>
> My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and
"projects" and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star
(or similar) rating system.
>
> Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make
it (or similar)
>
> Jachym
>
> po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>> napsal:
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:jachym.cepicky@gmail.
__com
<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:jachym.cepicky@__
gmail.com
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
> former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in
past, but you can find more at
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/__OSGeo_Labs
<http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs>)
>
> Hi Jachym,
>
> do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name
"OSGeo Labs" by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo
Research and Educational laboratories which might be often
shortened to OSGeo Labs, although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing.
The mainling list is ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such
an issue since the term "Geo for All" (http://www.geoforall.org/)
is now used more and more (well, the linked website as OSGeo Labs
in the title element).
>
> Thanks for taking this into consideration,
> Vaclav
>
>
_________________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>__>
http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/discuss
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the
addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately
delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.
_________________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>__>
http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/discuss
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
_________________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]><__mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>__>
http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/discuss
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the
addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately
delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.
_________________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/discuss
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
