That is a *great* talk, and shows a lot of areas where we can improve. There has been a consistent call for "incubation" to continue to hold projects accountable to OSGeo standards. I have resisted these calls as I view incubation as an outreach activity - part of our mission to promote open/transparent software development.
Still that is great to have an external review; is that review public? -- Jody Garnett On 21 March 2017 at 01:18, Venkatesh Raghavan <ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp > wrote: > Maxi also made an excelling presentation on related topic > at FOSS4G-Asia 2017. The presentation is available at > > http://www.slideshare.net/cannata/massimiliano-cannata-keyno > te-foss4gasia-2017 > > Best > > Venka > > On 2017/03/20 22:08, Jeff McKenna wrote: > >> Actually Maxi and I did a recent thorough research into OSGeo project use >> of infrastructure, by each project, and it was published as a paper (or >> soon to be). In the short term I know Maxi has submitted it as a talk for >> FOSS4G-Europe. It's good to take a step back and review old processes. >> Actually we hope that that was a start of a regular OSGeo project 'health >> checkup', which obviously is very needed. For example, it was quite >> shocking how many current OSGeo projects are functioning without any >> regular Project Steering Committee meetings, or even a visible Project >> Steering Committee. I am sure Maxi will be sharing those results at >> FOSS4G-E. >> >> -jeff >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss