On mardi 22 août 2017 14:07:04 CEST Jeff McKenna wrote: > Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion. We > should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into > wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards. But > that is all my own opinion :) Then we can link to these standards. As > of now anyone can create a 'standard' and post it on the beta site, > seems very odd to me.
Just a remainder that OGC is not the only source of standards. For example, GeoJSON is IETF RFC 7946 for example (and before last year, was a community standard). GeoTIFF can also be considered as a defacto standard, etc.. You have also the ISO standards for metadata, etc... Probably a loose definition for standards could be a specification available somewhere (potentially behind a paywall like ISO...), and implemented by at least several software/ vendors. Even > > Is my opinion here too strong? For now I chose just to edit the > descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not. > > What do you prefer? > > -jeff > > On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > > Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer > > meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make sense. > > > > Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards? > > > > > > > > -- > > Jody Garnett > > > > On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com > > > > <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>> wrote: > > Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if > > you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as > > many of these are not actual standards) when you are editing your > > project page, please let me know and I will edit the new standard > > and add a description - I have just went through all of these > > "standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27 "standards". > > > > For example: > > (WPS) > > > > will now appear on the project pages as: > > > > Web Processing Service (WPS) > > > > This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users to our > > site. > > > > thanks all! > > > > -jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss