Never mind, you can have nesting, so OGC can contain WFS, WMS, WCS, etc... -- Jody Garnett
On 22 August 2017 at 11:09, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: > You can click on the number, in this case 11, and see a list of the > projects implementing the OGC standard. I am deleting it now... > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 22 August 2017 at 10:17, Even Rouault <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On mardi 22 août 2017 14:07:04 CEST Jeff McKenna wrote: >> >> > Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion. We >> >> > should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into >> >> > wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards. But >> >> > that is all my own opinion :) Then we can link to these standards. As >> >> > of now anyone can create a 'standard' and post it on the beta site, >> >> > seems very odd to me. >> >> >> >> Just a remainder that OGC is not the only source of standards. For >> example, GeoJSON is IETF RFC 7946 for example (and before last year, was a >> community standard). GeoTIFF can also be considered as a defacto standard, >> etc.. You have also the ISO standards for metadata, etc... >> >> Probably a loose definition for standards could be a specification >> available somewhere (potentially behind a paywall like ISO...), and >> implemented by at least several software/vendors. >> >> >> >> Even >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Is my opinion here too strong? For now I chose just to edit the >> >> > descriptions for all of these 'standards', valid or not. >> >> > >> >> > What do you prefer? >> >> > >> >> > -jeff >> >> > >> >> > On 2017-08-22 1:59 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: >> >> > > Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer >> >> > > meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make >> sense. >> >> > > >> >> > > Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards? >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > Jody Garnett >> >> > > >> >> > > On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna < >> [email protected] >> >> > > >> >> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> > > Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if >> >> > > you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as >> >> > > many of these are not actual standards) when you are editing your >> >> > > project page, please let me know and I will edit the new standard >> >> > > and add a description - I have just went through all of these >> >> > > "standards" and set descriptions for each of the 27 "standards". >> >> > > >> >> > > For example: >> >> > > (WPS) >> >> > > >> >> > > will now appear on the project pages as: >> >> > > >> >> > > Web Processing Service (WPS) >> >> > > >> >> > > This consistency makes it much easier to read for new users to our >> >> > > site. >> >> > > >> >> > > thanks all! >> >> > > >> >> > > -jeff >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Discuss mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services >> >> http://www.spatialys.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
