Let me just suggest, again, that the board be elected using Ranked Choice Voting with Proportional Representation. This allows the different significant interests that are still in the minority of the membership to coalesce around candidates who represent those interests so that they can get a seat on the board and ensure a fair hearing. This is automatic, it doesn't require districting or quotas.
http://www.fairvote.org/fair_representation — Andy On Oct 31, 2017, at 2:04 AM, Vicky Vergara <vi...@georepublic.de> wrote: Hi all, Frank: I have being woman all my life and also Mexican, I fall in both categories, but personally I want to win in a fair game, not to fill a quota, and in this case is two quotas!!!. I don't feel that ever in my life I won something to fill a quota and I don't want to start to be used to fill a quota. Storm is over and my baby elephant is eating fresh grass that is starting to grow. Being on the board or not, there is work to be done. Regards Vicky PS. I will think of option(s) that are not filling quotas. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Frank Warmerdam <warmer...@pobox.com<mailto:warmer...@pobox.com>> wrote: On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Ravi Kumar <manarajahmundry2...@gmail.com<mailto:manarajahmundry2...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Will be happy to see those who have let 'The Clouds In Motion'... and those > 'Giving us a good harvest of GRASS'.. speak out too. Ravi, I am not sure, but in light of my signature perhaps 'the clouds in motion' is a hint to me. I don't see any need to rerun this election, nor am I particularly concerned co-CRO who is nominated to run, etc. Lets all give folks the benefit of the doubt, and it isn't like the board has their fingers on the button of nuclear weapons. :-) Like Sanghee I am concerned that the board is less diverse than I would have hoped by now. I think it would be reasonable to adapt the board selection criteria to ensure at least some diversity on axes we want to see covered. I could imagine a couple of special rules like: - If by normal voting no female would be elected, and if there is a female running in the election the female with the most votes will replace the otherwise lowest voted person who would have made the board. - If by normal voting no two board members are selected who are outside "north america + europe" and if there are such candidates running then replace the otherwise lowest voted person who would have made the board with the the candidates outside of NA+EUR with the most votes. Well some word smithing and algorithm clarification would be needed, but you get the general idea, and a number of variations would be helpful in moving us towards more diverse representation. I would prefer to see a change in board voting rules of this nature passed by a vote of the charter members rather than just put in place by the board. But most of all, I wish to encourage us all to recognise that we are an organization of volunteers and that we have similar goals. While we fine tune things, I hope we try to avoid taking offense and ascribe the best intentions to others in our community. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com<mailto:warmer...@pobox.com> light and sound - activate the windows | and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Salzmannstraße 44, 81739 München, Germany Vicky Vergara Operations Research eMail: vi...@georepublic.de<http://georepublic.de/> Web: https://georepublic.info<https://georepublic.info/> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1 Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9 Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428 CEO: Daniel Kastl _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
