On 04/09/11 15:49, Dimitris Moraitis wrote: >> Another question, regarding transcoding daemon. What there any specific >> > reason you didn't went with socket.io to get back the info when video is >> > transcoded? I might have few hours this weekend to play with idea of >> > using socket.io+pyramid+celery as a transcoding daemon. > Sounds like a good plan. I don't think socket.io was available back when we > first released the first version of transcode daemon after the Budapest Plone > conference & sprint. > > We gave a shot a few months ago at refactoring the daemon using Celery and > RabbitMQ but it turned out that it would require much more time than was > allocated to the task in order to do it in a sane and backwards compatible > way, so we dropped it. > > Let me know if you release any code in that direction. I'd be happy to try it > out.
as all weekends also this one was too short to do anything more then i planned. great ... i think we share same ideas and i would definitely like to hear more what were the problems (especially to be backwards compatible). _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plumi.org/listinfo/discuss
