On 04/09/11 22:38, Rok Garbas wrote: > after a day working again with subversion (i had to actually alias svn > to git) i was wondering if anybody would have some strong feeling > against the move to git and github in particular. > > since plone is moving its code to github might be a interesting choice > for plumi to follow, but its ofcourse not obligatory. > > [16:23:29] <garbas> dimo: you ever discussed moving to git? > [16:23:51] * garbas has time while wait for git-svn clone to finish :P > [16:24:58] <dimo> we haven't discussed it, but I guess if that's where > the Plone collective is heading, Plumi will eventually follow > [16:25:46] <garbas> dimo: k … i'm just migrationg stuff for plone > [16:25:52] <garbas> i might as well do it for plumi if you want > [16:27:43] <garbas> dimo: at least i reserved plumi as a name of > organization (https://github.com/organizations/plumi) > [16:28:53] <dimo> cool. let me inform the other devs and I'll let you > know if we're all ready to move to git > [16:29:22] <garbas> great … i'll give it try to move to git > [16:29:25] <garbas> github > [16:30:17] <garbas> dimo: just tickets, milestones, tags could be also > migrated … but not sure if i would have time to do it > > > since i'm anyway doing migration of plone repositories to github this > month i could migrate also plumi repositories to plumi organization (i > already reserved a name). > > maybe an option would also be moving all the tickets and management to > github/issues. but that would require a little bit more work. > > > i hope i wont start a new which vcs to use war :) >
and few hours later ... [22:44:47] <dimo> garbas: I talked with a couple other Plumi devs and they're all ok with switching to git+github. So, feel free to go ahead with the migration. It would be great if tags get migrated as well but it's not critical [22:45:39] <garbas> dimo: great … i posted a mail to mailinglist just in case [22:45:48] <garbas> dimo: tags / branches … everything [22:46:21] <garbas> dimo: i'm also checking that the contents of them is the same ... and few hours more ... [00:47:11] <garbas> dimo: online? [00:47:58] <dimo> garbas: yes, I'm about to get to bed though [00:48:14] <garbas> quick question ... [00:48:21] <garbas> is 4.1 branch still supported? [00:48:33] <garbas> only problem i have with that branch [00:48:41] <garbas> everything else is migrated ok [00:49:35] <garbas> dimo: ^ [00:50:44] <dimo> garbas: no. feel free to skip it [00:51:18] <garbas> dimo: perfect … i'll publish repositories to github.com/plumi [00:51:23] <garbas> whats your github name [00:53:52] <dimo> unweb & dimo-unweb [00:56:16] <garbas> done … i've added this to as owners [00:56:24] <garbas> to=two [00:56:54] <dimo> great! thanks [00:57:51] <garbas> we can talk more tomorrow … i'll get also the buildout running with new sources [00:58:50] <dimo> ok! ... and hour more and voila... https://github.com/plumi packages being migrated: - plumi.app - plumi.content - plumi.locales - plumi.skin - collective.piwik.core - collective.piwik.flowplayer - collective.transcode.daemon - collective.transcode.recipe - collective.transcode.star i skipped: - plone.app.locales (i'm going to do as part of plone migration) - collective.contentlicensing (i think release is need for this package anyway, and then ask author if he want migrate it to github) and for the end ... replacing sources with github ones ... and it works :) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plumi.org/listinfo/discuss
