Hmm, the team speak idea is kind of interesting. It might make it so people who cant be at some of the bigger presentations can remote in, but still be able to answer questions. There is an option for a marked speaker to make everyone else go quite when they speak. And as a non-profit we qualify for the 512 user licence.
The only thing with the 1 mic idea is we would have to get presenters to say the question before they answer it, and not just start answering it. Otherwise it may not make sense. Ive seen presenters do this, but we not always have professional presenters. Video is doable, we can easily set up screen recording as well, so if someone is showing code or something on the projector we could have seperate video of just that. Now, this is assuming that we have a presentation in the future from someone worth recording On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > For talks, we'd only need a single mic, since there's only one person > (who matters). > > I think video is important, since I like to use the whiteboard when > teaching/lecturing. > > Ron > > On 2013-01-30 08:27, Ace Tunes wrote: > > We would need to make sure to get a room/area mic (maybe two considering > > how big our meeting space is, our classrooms at UCN weren't much bigger > and > > we were running up to four area mics). As for the camera; it might even > be > > worth looking at the option of leaving it out, from my experience I found > > that the classes without video stream went smoothest. When it comes to > > recording it, software would be all we would need, but I don't know of > any > > free software that records sessions like that..... hmmm.... unless, I > just > > used teamspeak for the first time the other day, and I know it has the > > option to record, but can we also, from the server side, force it so that > > only one person's mic can be live? If so that might be an option, I am > sure > > we could host one on the sksp servers that would be turned on for > meetings > > only. With that we could use one piece of software to stream AND record. > We > > also could look at a Walkie-Talkie style application, though I don't know > > of any free ones, that would allow every user to participate in the > > meeting; one that we used, that I am particularly fond of, is Elluminate. > > Elluminate offers one way (editable) mic chatter, IRC style chat, and if > we > > really want video chat, as well as a whiteboard system. If we could find > a > > free version, or a REALLY cheap version, of that kind of thing it might > be > > worth it. > > > > Meako > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In your opinion, what would it take to record/stream talks? One mic (we > > > can probably get for free), an Internet connection we have, ustream is > > > free, I'm sure we could find an unused camera. What else would we need? > > > I imagine software of some sort, I can't think of much else. > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
