I remember seeing a pile of firewire camcorders at SkSp 1.0 that had been used at least once at talks done at RRC. What happened to those?
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ken DeWitt <[email protected] > wrote: > I have a xbox 360 connect that we might be able to use. > > -- > > Any question or comments you can email or call me at any time. > I will get back to you as fast as I can. > > Thank you and have a nice day!! > > Ken DeWitt > Your Fellow Tech. Guy > > Phone # : 204-998-3218 > Email: kendewitt@y <[email protected]>ftg.ca > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Aemilianus Kehler <[email protected]>wrote: > >> These are great ideas and I would love to help implement it, when time >> permits. >> >> Cheers!! >> >> On Jan 30, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Ace Tunes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That sounds like the best option for mics in mho. >> On Jan 30, 2013 10:48 AM, "chris kluka" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My honest simple suggestion would be to have 2 mic's plugged into one >>> sound card. >>> >>> One cardioid facing the presenter and one omni in the center of the >>> room. >>> >>> As far as cost goes, its just the cost of 1 extra microphone. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> With presentations, I think >1 mic is overkill. It's not a big deal for >>>> either the presenter to rephrase the question before answering (the way >>>> that's typically solved), or for the recording to just plain miss the >>>> questions. Getting the questions recorded isn't important enough to way >>>> overengineer this, IMO. >>>> >>>> Ron >>>> >>>> On 2013-01-30 10:12, Jim MacKenzie wrote: >>>> > Hmm, the team speak idea is kind of interesting. It might make it so >>>> people >>>> > who cant be at some of the bigger presentations can remote in, but >>>> still be >>>> > able to answer questions. >>>> > There is an option for a marked speaker to make everyone else go >>>> quite when >>>> > they speak. >>>> > And as a non-profit we qualify for the 512 user licence. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > The only thing with the 1 mic idea is we would have to get presenters >>>> to >>>> > say the question before they answer it, and not just start answering >>>> it. >>>> > Otherwise it may not make sense. Ive >>>> > seen presenters do this, but we not always have professional >>>> presenters. >>>> > >>>> > Video is doable, we can easily set up screen recording as well, so if >>>> > someone is showing code or something on the projector we could have >>>> > seperate video of just that. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Now, this is assuming that we have a presentation in the future from >>>> > someone worth recording >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > For talks, we'd only need a single mic, since there's only one >>>> person >>>> > > (who matters). >>>> > > >>>> > > I think video is important, since I like to use the whiteboard when >>>> > > teaching/lecturing. >>>> > > >>>> > > Ron >>>> > > >>>> > > On 2013-01-30 08:27, Ace Tunes wrote: >>>> > > > We would need to make sure to get a room/area mic (maybe two >>>> considering >>>> > > > how big our meeting space is, our classrooms at UCN weren't much >>>> bigger >>>> > > and >>>> > > > we were running up to four area mics). As for the camera; it >>>> might even >>>> > > be >>>> > > > worth looking at the option of leaving it out, from my experience >>>> I found >>>> > > > that the classes without video stream went smoothest. When it >>>> comes to >>>> > > > recording it, software would be all we would need, but I don't >>>> know of >>>> > > any >>>> > > > free software that records sessions like that..... hmmm.... >>>> unless, I >>>> > > just >>>> > > > used teamspeak for the first time the other day, and I know it >>>> has the >>>> > > > option to record, but can we also, from the server side, force it >>>> so that >>>> > > > only one person's mic can be live? If so that might be an option, >>>> I am >>>> > > sure >>>> > > > we could host one on the sksp servers that would be turned on for >>>> > > meetings >>>> > > > only. With that we could use one piece of software to stream AND >>>> record. >>>> > > We >>>> > > > also could look at a Walkie-Talkie style application, though I >>>> don't know >>>> > > > of any free ones, that would allow every user to participate in >>>> the >>>> > > > meeting; one that we used, that I am particularly fond of, is >>>> Elluminate. >>>> > > > Elluminate offers one way (editable) mic chatter, IRC style chat, >>>> and if >>>> > > we >>>> > > > really want video chat, as well as a whiteboard system. If we >>>> could find >>>> > > a >>>> > > > free version, or a REALLY cheap version, of that kind of thing it >>>> might >>>> > > be >>>> > > > worth it. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Meako >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Ron <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > In your opinion, what would it take to record/stream talks? One >>>> mic (we >>>> > > > > can probably get for free), an Internet connection we have, >>>> ustream is >>>> > > > > free, I'm sure we could find an unused camera. What else would >>>> we need? >>>> > > > > I imagine software of some sort, I can't think of much else. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Ron >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>>> > > > Help: >>>> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>>> > > > Archive: >>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>>> > > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>>> > > Archive: >>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>>> > > >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) >>>> >>>> iEYEARECAAYFAlEJTcIACgkQ2t2zxlt4g/SHRACgpxvtcYhpnpJx9bcS4Ks4B6/J >>>> aW8AoJOJ9iTZIJD7jA4xJVPGrGjM/GqJ >>>> =C8k4 >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss >> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/ >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
