CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
You do the keypad, I'll mount the lockbox at the same time. :D


On 26 March 2013 19:45, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> wrote:

> Again, wasting time. For the price of a number-combo lockbox I can install
> a number-combo keypad on the door that'll do the same without the annoying
> lockbox step. But then again he has to give a combination to all his
> workers etc.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Colin, there is a such thing as number-combo lockboxes. What can be
>> simpler than that? Code is left with Bob, liason happens between worker and
>> admin's office, boom done next. Why are we still considering moving
>> deadbolts and paying $500 when we have such a simple solution? :P
>>
>>
>> On 26 March 2013 17:58, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Siu, while I'm always eager and thankful for any suggestions and help, I
>>> hate lockboxes. With very few exceptions (WISP gear on rooftops being one)
>>> they're a bad use of time and money. In this case, a lockbox would very
>>> likely have differently-sized keys than the ones Bob and his employees
>>> alraedy have for the building, so we'd need to give them all keys for the
>>> lockbox... but it'd be easier to just give them all fobs and that would
>>> give us auditing at the same time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Remote access will require an estimated $500 software upgrade. I
>>>> suspect a lockbox by our door (ideally keyed to our old lock) containing an
>>>> emergency fob would be more cost effective.
>>>>
>>>> A flag or poster would probably be ok to display inside one if our
>>>> windows.
>>>> On Mar 26, 2013 2:12 PM, "Ian Trump" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I had an extensive phone call with the Landlord, I am very sorry to
>>>>> inform you of the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Be advised the Landlord is not permitting the installation of a Flag,
>>>>> Canadian, or otherwise mounted externally on the building.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The landlord cited our lease agreement, potential issues from
>>>>> Heritage/Exchange Character/City of Winnipeg By-Law and the potential for
>>>>> yearly sign/flag licensing fee. A potentially liability issue
>>>>> with the Flag, pole and assembly accumulating large chucks of
>>>>> ice/snow causing failure of the assembly and damage to building, or
>>>>> pedestrians below.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The landlord requested we limit, with his permission, our cosmetic
>>>>> changes to inside our rented space.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On a Positive note:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> By and large the landlord is happy with us as tenants. There have
>>>>> been no complaints from any of our neighbours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As a gesture of good faith, he has agreed to foot the bill for the
>>>>> panic bar escape for the back door. He is committed to the electrical
>>>>> repair of the "cut conduit" issue currently effecting the freezer and
>>>>> fridge. We agreed to deal with the Kitchen GFI Plug issue as soon as
>>>>> we can get Soma to execute the work. Please be aware that we leased the
>>>>> space (as is) so these concessions and improvements are
>>>>> quite noteworthy and indicative of a Landlord who values us as tenants
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Landlord has grudging accepted our Keyfob access control system
>>>>> on the condition that we provide quick access to his building personal in
>>>>> the event of an emergency. It would be very good idea if we:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Had the remote capability of opening our door.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. We have the Access Control hooked to the fire alarm to open the
>>>>> door for emergency exit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Meeting concluded on a positive note, as he is impressed by our
>>>>> willingness to keep the space clean and tidy, improve the space and 
>>>>> execute
>>>>> quality work on our external security system (Good Job Colin!)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>>>> [email protected]] on behalf of Colin Stanners [
>>>>> [email protected]]
>>>>> *Sent:* March 26, 2013 12:52
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Skullspace Flag
>>>>>
>>>>>  Can't really use the current banner - turning it on its side doesn't
>>>>> look good IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Roswyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  I think the black rectangular logo would be better, though it's
>>>>>> more a "banner" shape than a "flag".  It's attractive, and the text helps
>>>>>> "explain" the logo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about the existing white banner that's already in the space?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of the flag designs shown, I prefer the Black logo with orange on
>>>>>> white, no text.  The text is overshadowed by the size of the logo, and
>>>>>> there's something cool and mysterious about just the logo.  (though it'd 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> horrifically ineffective as advertising)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Justin Lacko <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...and that you're using the correct font, right?
>>>>>>> Also I was thinking a different grey... but I'll show you later
>>>>>>> today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On 25 March 2013 23:27, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I put all those suggestions together. But I don't think it works
>>>>>>>> well to keep the text together and at only one end of the sign, looks
>>>>>>>> unbalanced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For #3, imagine that I know what I'm doing in Inkscape and that the
>>>>>>>> white area around the text is grey.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>>> Archive:
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to