Disagreements such as this are best settled with one very special
weapon.....      An Occilloscope.
"Draw your scope at 90 paces!"
;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phillip Kerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Slim Devices Discussion'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: RE: [slim] What can I do to get the best sound?


> > > You might check the actual cost of the DAC in the SB2.
> > I'll bet it's less
> > > than $10.
> >
> > I might?  Apparently you couldn't be bothered to.
> >
> > Even if we settled on $5 (probably low) -- that's still over five
> > times the cost of a $0.99 DAC.  There's lots of room for improvement
> > there.
> >
> > *My* point was that the DAC in the SB2 was likely to be superior.
> > What is your point?
> >
>
>
> Okay, so this doesn't need to get out of hand.  In fact, I did check the
DAC
> cost and it was $8.  But, right, the one in the SB2 is definitely good.
>
> Did we ever establish which CD player is being used for comparison?  Maybe
> the DAC isn't $.99 (as if that really matters anyway).
>
> In my comparisons, the SB2 analog out isn't as good as a high end CD
> player's analog out.  However, the digital out is definitely comparable.
> Also true is the idea that different isn't necessarily better.  My ears,
> however, tell me the SB2's digital out to my receiver's DAC has more open
> sound and more high end detail.  Also, when playing a HDCD (turned to
FLAC)
> my receiver knows it's a 20bit signal.  When I play the same FLAC through
> SB2's DAC the difference is very pronounced.
>
> Thanks,
> Phillip
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to