CavesOfTQLT Wrote: > The size of the file, length it is, recorded at 89dB or 93dB, etc. makes > no difference - it's still the same *Beat It* track.
If it doesn't make a difference then why are you using FLAC? Why not re-encode all your FLAC's to 320kbps MP3's. And you could additionally do this dupe-removing too to save a ton of space. Don't just use FLAC because the assumption bigger=better or because these "audiophile" people all do it. If the statement you wrote above is correct then clearly FLAC is not for you, and you'd be wasting disk space using it. -- Jim _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
