Dan Sully Wrote: 
> 
> 
> There's really only so much that can be done here.. the Windows FS
> isn't the best for reading a large directory like that..
> 
> 

In fact Windows XP does just fine; a short perl script that does
nothing more than an opendir(), readdir(), closedir() on my music
folder takes at most 1 second to run. (The file system is on an
internal drive running on the same PC as the SlimServer.)

I can even traverse my entire music library, about 16,000 files, using
perl's File::Find package, in about 15 seconds. But since browsing the
music folder only requires the perl code to read a single directory and
create some HTML that represents what it finds, there's obviously a lot
more going on and much room for improvement. 

There's simply no way the performance I'm seeing in 6.0.2 can be blamed
on Windows XP. 

I had thought this was a known problem and something that was being
worked on -- that there was a lot of unnecessary work going on with the
DB in addition to just doing a readdir() -- but if that's not the case
I'll file a bug report (or add my comments to an existing report if
someone else has already done so).

SBB


-- 
Steve Baumgarten
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to