Fleury;329847 Wrote: 
> I know Moose is a fancy slipcover for SC, but my point is that the
> minute or two it takes 600 album covers to load in SC takes about 15
> seconds or less in Moose. Moose does a far superior job of handling
> cover art. If it is drawing on the same db cache file as SC, then
> something in the web interface is the culprit, maybe Firefox (which I
> am using) vs. IE?

Why are you loading 600 covers? That's always going to take time
because of the way HTTP works (only a few can be requested at a
time)...but the browsing modes in SC specifically limit the number of
images per page for that reason. If Moose is caching the images locally
then that will help it's performance a lot - but your web browser should
also be doing some caching - maybe increase it's cache size?


-- 
radish
------------------------------------------------------------------------
radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51140

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to