On 19-Oct-08, at 4:01 PM, JJZolx wrote: > > kdf;351342 Wrote: >> It seems obvious from the resulting design that feedback was heard >> from >> threads such as these: > > I remember those threads quite well. They were a lot of fun, and I > was > thrilled to see the design of the Transporter take them to heart. > good. Without fun, there is no third party community.
>> A true cynic would suggest that your negativity now is more a case of >> not getting exactly what you wanted, as opposed to bad or >> ill-considered design. > > I don't feel I'm being negative, just stating what others have > apparently also observed. Fair enough. How that message come across, my not be entirely as you intended, perhaps. > But the Boom hit it nearly on the nose and that > knowledge could be used to produce a better Transporter II, or > incorporated into future products. I'd expect no less. The Transporter is a major technological leap from where Squeeze- products were before. Given the branding it has, I would expect we may not the its like again any time soon, but certainly lessons have been learned and the benefits already show. -kdf _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
