MadScientist;362267 Wrote: > Hhh! I see little point in going dowm this route if you've got to > process your hi-res 24/96 files via a lossy format. It has to be > flac-to-flac or nothing. > > MS
No, this is much better than what we did before. OK, I was mistakenly thinking that this was being done with sox, but it's actually using lame to convert to mp3. However, that is way better than dropping every other sample, which causes massive aliasing - all the material above 22 KHz gets folded down into the audible band. Also, the CPU can't actually keep up with 96Khz flac decoding, so you would get audible dropouts too. I must sound like a broken record by now... Andy - is there a bug open to upgrade this to use flac->sox->flac? -- seanadams ------------------------------------------------------------------------ seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=55371 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
