autopilot;418171 Wrote: > The fact that the Soundbridge's had shocking poor build quality did not > help. TBH though i think SC's continual improvement and vastly superior > feature set helped.
I started with a Soundbridge because I was interested primarily in Internet radio easily integrated with my main stereo. I liked it so much I bought another for the bedroom. There's no question that the Squeezebox is a better product to begin with and better supported on top of that, but at the time I started doing all this stuff, there was a $100 price difference that wasn't worth it to me when I was not yet interested in doing the "Put your CDs on the computer" thing. My Soundbridges were generally pretty stable (imperfect, but OK). If they'd reliably figured out gapless playback and didn't have the DTS-killing "feature" of converting everything to 48kHz, I probably would have stayed satisfied. -- atrocity ------------------------------------------------------------------------ atrocity's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16009 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62643 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
