Mark Miksis;454662 Wrote: > Some people simply don't like a touch screen and won't use it. That's > fine. But please note that the Touch is the same price as the Classic > and comes with an IR remote so it doesn't cost you anything to not use > it as a touch screen. The goal is for the IR-mode large text display to > be usable from at least 10 feet away.
I love my iPod Touch and would have an iPhone if I was still in business. Not liking touch screens is not the point. I just want it in my hand, not plugged into my HiFi. "What is the point" was actually a question - I am prepared to be convinced, but all the other features could have been added to the Classic or the Duet. The thing is, I really like my Classic and my Boom. They have transformed the way I listen to music, taken with SqueezeCenter. I like the big text option on the Classic. When I was having serious problems with my eyesight that feature was invaluable. I will take another look at the Touch but it stills looks to me like an alternative that is different, not better. So please don't abandon the Classic. -- dBerriff FLAC, SB3, Boom, Musical Fidelity kW250S, Castle Stirling 3's, MacBook, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, Yamaha MSP5s ------------------------------------------------------------------------ dBerriff's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12247 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67399 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
