Goodsounds;458121 Wrote: > I generally agree with your comments here but not this one. I'd bet the > decision driver here for the company is maximum interoperability, not > component cost. The cost is not that significant, and what is at issue > is a strategic market decision. So long as G routers/APs continue to be > sold and have a greater than trivial presence in homes (and if N routers > continue to be G+N), it would be a mistake to make a product that > doesn't work with G. Maybe dual standard cards might be used at a future > date? > > There are many Wifi component suppliers, high-ish part prices don't > last long in such markets. Both N class client devices and N class infrastructure devices are are backwards compatible with other G equipment.
-- funkstar my collection: *1*x squeezebox radio *1*x squeezebox touch *1*x squeezebox boom *2*x controller, *1*x receiver *2*x sb3 (sliver/black), *1*x sb2 wired (silver) *1*x sb (black), *1*x slimp3 (with rear shield) interested in any others if you have them! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=67882 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
