Exactly. Any anyone who thinks this is simple, is basically clueless. You don't make this kind of rework without time, and sadly the return on investment for these types of changes is too low to make it something that happens instead of new product or fixing lower hanging fruit.
Not to mention that artwork handling came about via third party contribution. Given that all third party stuff faces limitations due to lack of direction from "management", you lose the finesse in trade for having the feature at all. -k On 2009-10-16, at 11:57 PM, JJZolx wrote: > > Mnyb;473373 Wrote: >> And sadly these: >> >> https://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8303 >> https://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9919 > > Bug 9919 basically states "we need to start all over with how artwork > is handled". It's never worked particularly well. I don't think it > requires or depends on a new database schema for the rest of the > library, although it would require a couple of new tables. The real > work is in the coding, as almost everything about finding, scanning > and > cataloging artwork would change. > > > -- > JJZolx > > Jim > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 > View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69894 > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@lists.slimdevices.com > http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
