kphinney;506796 Wrote: 
> Very good point Funkstar;  perhaps it would be based around the Touch. 
> That would be unfortunate.  The Touch is good for what it is.  The
> Transporter is (was) a product geared toward the high-end user AND was
> developed by the SlimDevices users in conjunction with SD.  Take a look
> at this article which shows how Sean and some of current members of the
> SD forums came up with and designed the TP:
> 
> "First The Customers Dreamed the Transporter Up..." 
> http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/111/ears-wide-open-sidebar.html
> 
> Will Logitech develop the next evolved Transporter on their own?  If
> it's based on the Touch, I feel failure will be inevitable.  (I
> certainly don't was a touch screen next to my tube amp.)
> 
> Assuming that Logitech would listen to the consumer willing to pay a
> few thousand dollars on a DS appliance, wouldn't it make sense to have a
> forum where the current users could give input?
> 
> This reminds me; I began a thread devoted to the next generation TP
> here.... 
> 
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69447

I reckon that the Touch into an external DAC can better the TP. I can't
prove it but I would not be surprised. Things move on...

As a transport, the Touch is awesome.
YMMV


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W -
MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x
LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Blue
Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables
Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74040

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to