seanadams wrote: > Points are awarded for the effectiveness of the troll, with > consideration for style, originality, and stealthiness. Judges > especially favor a convincing appeal to newly discovered pseudoscience > and techno-jargon.
OK, so if a post talks about newly invented pseudoscience, it gets more from the judges. If it uses well established nonsense such as jitter, it gets some, etc. The best score is 10/10, for perfect execution, creativity, and freshness. Note, a 1/10 is still troll food, just not as perfect. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
