newy;547066 Wrote: > He's right. What is the point of having a touch screen if it supposed to > be used with an A/V system which is probably IR controlled? The SB3 or > Transporter are much more appropriate and easier to read than the SB > Touch and the SB Radio and SB Boom, with their built in speakers, are > much more appropriate for almost any other application. To me, and I > may be wrong, the SB Touch totally misses the mark, whatever that mark > is. > > They should have combined the Radio and the Touch into one product.
Well I will preface my comments with I use my Touch with my Headphone rig so for me it is perfect device. I can understand the thought that a touch interface on a device in a stereo rack probably does not make much sense. But my question to that is why place it in the stereo rack? If you connect via spdif most setups would allow you to run spdif easily over 30ft. The other issue is even if you put it near your stereo why is have a Touch interface a "bad" thing? Yea I know it seems to be the "most" marketed part of the device but it is far from the most important part. For me even with the Touch within arms length I tend to not use the "touch" interface much because my iphone with iPeng is just a better interface and this is not really the fault of the Touch per se just the fact that the iphone can easily fit in one hand and is a more comfortable form factor. -- m1abrams ------------------------------------------------------------------------ m1abrams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=850 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78738 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
