bobkoure;551166 Wrote: > Sorry but it's not. Even with ancient wiring, signal quality is fine > after this distance. Try it - scopes are cheap and handheld these days. > That's not the issue. > > The issue is timing and the "length" of the packet (literal length, as > in the length of wire the packet occupies, given the speed of electrons > in a conductor). Then explain the following: > In most cases a cabling solution is developed to support a > faster transmission protocol. Todays fastest protocol over > UTP cable is 10GBase-T (10,000Base-T) transmission. This > is supported by Cat 6 for a limited distance of 37 > to 55 meters, and by Augmented Cat 6 to 100 meters. source: http://www.adc.com/us/en/Library/Literature/105011AE.pdf
The signal length stays the same, the protocol stays the same, the signal speed within the medium will be approximately the same, but the maximum length of the medium is not the same... So it probably has nothing to do with the speed of the medium and the signal length... > Cat 6 does give a much better signal to noise ratio > than 5e, at all frequencies.(same source as above) That is probably the reason for that maximum of 100 meters... There are no collisions between 2 directly UTP connected devices. -- servies There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those who understand binary and those who don't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ servies's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9496 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79140
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
