MelonMonkey;570344 Wrote: 
> You don't have to convince me, I own two Squeezeboxes.  However, for the
> majority of people out there, you'd better believe that offering a free
> software-based player is going to cost Logitech some money.
> 
> For instance, I know a friend can't afford any of the existing
> Squeezebox models right now.  I'm going to set up their computer system
> simply to distribute audio to their stereo system upstairs and it will
> be controlled from their iPod Touch using iPeng.  How much money has
> Logitech made from this?  $0. 
> 
> Logitech need to start putting more attention into the Squeezebox line
> as they're completely off the radar now in terms of consumer and media
> mindshare.  Any time anything about music streaming comes up, every
> reporter/blogger immediately mentions SONOS.  Usually, Squeezebox is
> not mentioned at all. 
> 
> I think leaving Squeezeplay on the back-burner is a good idea and
> they'd better start moving on some controller-only apps for popular
> handheld devices, as well as coming out with a few more player
> products.  There's a market for commercial software as well, but the
> problem with this is that Logitech is a hardware company, and like many
> of their contemporaries, they can't seem to handle a Hardware+Software
> business very well, seeing software only as a support vehicle for the
> hardware, instead of its most important asset.  Hardware is cheap, the
> value is all in software - and that's for pretty much all consumer
> electronics products.
> 
> While they're at it, they might consider making a decent web page so
> people can actually find out about the Squeezebox family - the current
> Logitech page is losing them a lot of sales.   Compare to the Sonos
> page where you can find out almost everything you want about the
> product(s).  Here's a neat thing to try.. Pretend you didn't know about
> this forum and now go to what you might find as the official Logitech
> page about Squeezbox and try to find this forum.  Good luck.

I generally agree with your points. But with regard to squeezeplay as a
software player, I can do the same thing you indicated with itunes,
foobar2000, winamp, or any number of other "free" players running on a
computer. Pre-squeezebox days, my system was Laptop w/USB drive >S/PDIF
coax out > Benchmark DAC I > audio input to preamp.  And my player on
the laptop was foobar2000. 

I don't think many people really want SB because of SbS. Frankly, the
SbS software is at the top of the list of things I'm not fond of. I
much preferred my foobar2000 (or even itunes!) in terms of library
management. 

But I agree, Logitech makes it very hard for a customer to find its
products and then even to clearly describe what they do (in terms that
the average consumer can figure out). My brother is a savvy guy, but he
could never understand the point of SB system until I showed him exactly
how it worked in my home. Now he has a touch and a boom. In some ways,
the fact that too many consumers think the SB player is simply a
substitute for a free software player on a computer is part of the
marketing problem. Sonos does a better job and part of the difference
is that they do push the idea of a SYSTEM for network music playback.
Squeezebox still comes off as too much of a bunch of standalone parts.
Heck, half the new posters on this site have yet to figure out the
difference between mysb.com and running SbS. But again, marketing and
information!!


-- 
garym
------------------------------------------------------------------------
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80169

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to