> Running SS 'interactively' should make no difference to
> performance, in fact some people believe it performs
> better than the service.

Windows workstations are generally set to give CPU priority to
"foreground" applications.  Accordingly, most of the background
services (including SlimServer) will receive a lower overall priority
and appear less responsive depending on the system configuration.  So
the "perception" that it might perform better "interactively" is
probably accurate for those running SlimServer on their local box.  Of
course, there are advantages to running in service mode (i.e. starts
automatically and you can't accidentally shut it down), especially when
installed on a dedicated application server that is configured to give
priority to background tasks.


-- 
bishopdonmiguel
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to