Griffin;613653 Wrote: > The 24/96 has a bit more bite there than it's downsampled 16/44 variant > as converted for a SB receiver. Which could well be related to either the noise shaping algorithm used by SoX for downsampling, or by differences in the way the Receiver and the Touch handle S/PDIF.
Griffin;613653 Wrote: > The difference thus can be heard in an ABX - but it makes no difference > in real life. I read a very well documented report on a french forum where the tester was able to successfully ABX 16/44.1 and 24/192 on digital silence... until he used proper dithering and noise shaping algorithms to downsample the 24bit/352.8kHz DXD file he was using as a reference. However, the point is, as you say: it makes no difference in real life. -- sebp 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/sebp) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ sebp's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11768 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85879 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
