Juggler;637401 Wrote: 
> ... thoughts? Speculations?
Let's keep the price point realistic. Except for perhaps some very
special, very temporary promotions by particular resellers, the
Receiver (SBR) was not priced less than US$100. The list price was
$150, and when Logitech's supplies got low the resellers on Amazon were
asking a lot more than that.

If you want to hit that price point, then Gb ethernet and "n" wireless
are a waste of money. You don't need that bandwidth even for hi-res
files. Cutting corners on sound quality for bandwidth you don't need
doesn't make any sense to me.

It's also important to remember that they could sell the SBR for half
the price of an SB3/Classic because the SB3's VFD screen was the most
expensive component in the device. That's not at all true of the
Touch's LCD touchscreen, which is relatively cheap. So to get a
screenless device down to a much lower price point you have to
sacrifice other features, though I still think they'd never go below
$100 because that's too low a price point in this market. 

Or instead of sacrificing features that are in the current Touch,
perhaps take advantage of the fact that the Touch hardware is now 2
years old (even though it was released 14 months ago, the hardware was
decided and in place at least a year before that). So they could
squeeze a little more mileage out of that "old" technology by using it
as the basis for an SBR2. They could potentially re-package the current
Touch in a screenless device, provided it could be setup and configured
via web browser or wifi remote. And they should make no promises about
TinySBS. I don't think that's gonna happen, but that's one way it could
go.


-- 
aubuti
------------------------------------------------------------------------
aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88170

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to