Lewis Moon;664622 Wrote: > I wondered about the tough set up w/o display. To be honest, yes the > touch looks like the right choice, but I really would rather NOT have > the display. In this day and age I see no reason to have another > display cluttering up the view space when it can be controlled by other > units. When my SB3 display went dead I hid the unit behind the receiver > and liked it that way.
Uhhh... if you hide it behind another component, what difference does it make? You can also set all of the screensavers (while playing, while inactive, while off) to a blank screen (it actually turns the display off). The screen will then only be active when you use the remote or the touchscreen. If you use some other user interface, it should never display anything. -- JJZolx » » Download 'Squeezebox Server 7.5.6 r35834' (http://downloads.slimdevices.com/SqueezeboxServer_v7.5.6_unreleased/), the last nightly build of SBS 7.5. » ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91062
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
