Pascal Hibon wrote: > Sure, that works if the recording itself is of good quality. That is > unfortunately not necessary true for all recordings out there. > Dynamic compression is not the only bad thing that happens during the > creation of an album.
Not at all numerous reasons , there migth not exist a good version ,but for mysterius reasons there always seems to exist multiple versions of some recordings ? Then they have a fallback position they hinted at , getting the best -possible- master . But then it may be sufficent to rerelease as 16/44.1 flac , lossles yes hirez no . Wonder if they going to stay of the temptation to sell it as 24/192 anyway at a premuim price he he (like hd tracks does with 1960's rolling stones) ;) Sadly i think mr .young bougth in the myth that 24/96-192 is necessary , so it may be but if the pricing is going to be higher because I get the random noise in classic/old recordings spread on more bits ? -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (in storage SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101133 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
