erland wrote: > mherger is doing some tests in LMS 7.9 beta at the moment to see if it > would be possible to speed-up the database on machines with more > memory. > Based on the library size in TB I suspect you have a decent amount of > tracks and might be affected by this change if it succeeds. > So, being able to use more than 1GB memory is not a bad idea, but I > doubt you will be able to take advantage of 16GB. > > Storing the database on a fast drive can make LMS a lot faster at the > moment, but this really isn't related to the motherboard. Some people > have experimented with setting up a RAM disk and using it for the LMS > database, this should improve performance significantly but it's also a > bit of configuration work to set it up. >
Among the feedback on these experiments; wasn't there one of the guys running ramdisk stating that with the new settings (database cache + cleanup) he got the same performance as when using a ramdisk?! I also went for a SSD drive in my server for OS+LMS; keeping all the music files on the old spinner. Main: Receiver (Audiocom) -> Beresford Caiman+ (Gatorized) -> Carver A-500x -> B&W 704 Office: Receiver -> Luxman L-210 -> Stax SR84 Pro -> Beresford Bushmaster -> Superlux HD668B Server: A8-5500, 4 GB, SSD+ 2*1 TB, Win8 w. SBS 7.8 (SQLite w. High Mem) Tied together by D-Link DIR-655 + DGS-1008D ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slate's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30502 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101521 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
