DanSmedra wrote: > Your first sentence (assertion) is at odds with everything I've read > about MQA over the past two years.
Then you must have been reading very selectively. > Your second statement suggests you're not aware of the issues. Numerous > articles are available to read and become educated. I am quite aware of the issues MQA purports to address. I am just not convinced it addresses them very successfully. If you disagree, I would love to hear your views. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104878 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
