If there is Prior Art that shows that someone came up with the idea before Sonos registered for the patent, the patent would not be considered novel and therefore not valid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art

Keep in mind, folks are awarded patents all the time where there is prior art. Patent reviewers typically can't find every nook and cranny to determine if a patent should be awarded.

Slim devices was sold in late 2006, so it would have been good for Slim Devices to have challenged this particularly if there was question about a patent by a competitor that could affect the value of the company when selling it to Logitech.

Tim

On 1/10/22 11:12 AM, chicks wrote:

ftlight wrote:
I posted a link to the patent earlier in this thread:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8588949B2/en

Slim Devices clearly had sold products with this facility earlier than
even the June 2003 priority date claimed by Sonos in the 2013 patent
above that is the basis of their claims against Google.

If they didn't patent it, though (and I can't find anything assigned to
Logitech that indicates they did), it's a moot point.



piTouch™ w/JustBoom DigiHat -> RME ADI-2 DAC FS -> JBL 305P MkII
monitors; LMS 8.2 on piCorePlayer/Pi 4;  Material Skin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
chicks's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=71798
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=115721


_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to