Aha...

I was looking through my collection trying to find 
something to send you.  I looked through 
SlimServer and it didn't take me long to find a 
truncated name.

Just to make sure everything was OK with it, I 
checked it with Mp3tag.  And what do you know, 
Mp3tag indicated that the tag itself was truncated!

Since I check all my tags, I am certain I wasn't 
the one truncating it - it was correct when I 
tagged it.  However, it was only recently I 
started removing ID3v1 tags and writing ID3v2 tags.

So I suspect these came about when I didn't know 
the difference between ID3v1 and ID3v2 tags.  They 
got truncated when writing the tags and only now 
that I'm writing ID3v2 tags can I correct them.

Mp3tag seems to cache the text entry within a 
session so you can write an over-30-character 
ID3v1 tag and have it show up properly, but it's 
not written properly and the next time you open 
the program it's truncated.

Every single truncated tag I'm seeing now can be 
corrected by writing ID3v2 tags.  Displays 
correctly in both SlimServer and Mp3tag.

So thanks for the help everyone, and I'm sorry if 
I misled anybody.  But I did learn something and I 
hope someone else did too - get rid of those evil 
ID3v1 tags!

Michaelwagner wrote:
> Mark Lanctot Wrote: 
> 
>>I'll live with it.
> 
> You said you're running 6.2.1?
> And it happens with artist and title, both?
> I'm running 6.2.0. I created a really long song
title and it all
> worked.
> It's hard to imagine that they re-introduced the 30
character limit in
> 6.2.1 (albeit by mistake, but still, it's a hell of
a mistake). 
> Can you send me one of these files?
> michael at thewagners dot ca
> 
> 

-- 
___________________________________
 

  Mark Lanctot
___________________________________


        

        
                
__________________________________________________________ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to