radish;139925 Wrote: > browsing the custom menus seemed a lot slower than the regular Browse... > menus. Is this expected? I could understand that caching, indices etc > could be optimised for the standard queries. I haven't looked at performance optimization at all yet so its probably possible to make them a bit faster. Also indexes in the slimserver database are optimized for the standard browse menus. In version 1.0 there were some queries that were a more complex than needed but this was corrected in the 1.1 release if I remember correct.
Anyway, so far my main priority has been the functionallity and this will probably also be the case in a few releases more, but after that its probably time to do some performance testing and optimization. -- erland Erland Isaksson 'My homepage' (http://erland.homeip.net) 'My download page' (http://erland.homeip.net/download) (Developer of 'TrackStat' (http://erland.homeip.net/download/do/viewapplication?name=slimserver-trackstat) , 'SQLPlayList' (http://erland.homeip.net/download/do/viewapplication?name=slimserver-sqlplaylist) , 'DynamicPlayList' (http://erland.homeip.net/download/do/viewapplication?name=slimserver-dynamicplaylist), 'Custom Browse' (http://erland.homeip.net/download/do/viewapplication?name=slimserver-custombrowse) and 'RandomPlayList' (http://erland.homeip.net/download/do/viewapplication?name=slimserver-randomplaylist) plugins) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27903 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
