On 1/8/07, MrSinatra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jack Coates;168445 Wrote:
> It's almost as if some streams come from farther across the Internet
> than others, and have more network hops... nah, that's crazy talk.
> Never mind.

i live 40minutes from the source of the stream.  yet other streams (and
all other streams are farther away from me than 40min), did work.

yes, i know geography isn't equal to net distance, but still, i don't
think the PSU.edu traffic goes to china b4 it gets to me 40min away.


They have these things called "diagnostic tools" you know. traceroute,
ping, and ethereal are almost everywhere, iptraf or bing would be
great if you're on *nix. Your hesitance to use them and post results
instead of SHOUTING a lot leads to my unwillingness to accept that
you've thoroughly eliminated all the other possible problems. You
haven't posted the results of a network bandwidth plugin test, you
haven't reported if it works when you moved to wired, and you haven't
said that you've used anything like *stumbler to validate your
wireless neighborhood. Maybe you've done all these things and are
insulted that anyone would impugn your troubleshooting capabilities,
but that hasn't been communicated adequately (except for the insulted
part).
...
> until recently. Now, if I only look at one problem in isolation, is it
> the failing NICs, or is it some Linux kernel bug, or is it Slim
> Devices firmware? Kinda hard to say until the whole thing fails,
> right?

sorry, but what exactly is your point?  that we can't be certain its SD
so we shouldn't focus on it and focus on everything else instead?


The point is that focusing on a single device in a complex system is a
great way to chase your own tail. This is what the OSI layers are for.

at the time i was having the problem, i STILL had ruled out all other
possibilities within reason.  LOCAL 256kbps mp3s worked, SOME other net
streams worked, but some didn't.

does the wireless care which stream i listen to???


Yes, obviously, because the buffer is draining. If the data flow is
marginal upstream of your location, hiccups in the last loop (wireless
in this case) become more prominent. Bear in mind that Winamp on your
PC has more than 25 megabits of buffer to work with.

and how close would a microwave need to be?  and would they have it on
24/7?


a) Depends how leaky it is.
b) What about a cordless phone? Or a generator? Or a home electronics
kit? Maybe you're down the street from ezkcdude, building DACs in his
garage :) I don't know that there is interference in your wireless
loop, but I haven't seen you effectively rule it out by posting that
the network bandwidth plugin is solidly 100%, so I'm mentioning it.

now, just b/c i can't tell you it isn't my neighbors nuclear powered
microwave with the certainty of god, doesn't mean, or imo, SHOULDN'T
mean that we can't put the focus where it belongs, on the SD product.
this is the reasonable most likely possibility at this point, unless u
can explain why you think it should be something else, given the
results as i described, (meaning some other streams worked, or the
local stuff worked wirelessly).

I'm all done talking. Good luck,
--
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin,
So across the Western ocean I must wander" -- traditional
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to