Patrick Dixon;180736 Wrote: > Apparently the SB1 doesn't sound nearly as good as even an SB2 - > although the only one I have ever seen was a dead one so I can't speak > from experience. >
Indeed, the SB2/3 sound significantly better than the SB1 Patrick Dixon;180736 Wrote: > > The SB1 is 'b' rather than 'g' wireless networking - so 10Mb/s rather > than 100Mb/s. > Well, you're kind of right, but are mixing things. The wireless SB1 indeed only supports 802.11b (11Mbps) rather than G (54Mbps). Additionally, the SB1's wired network interface was only 10baseT rather than 100baseT. Patrick Dixon;180736 Wrote: > > Also the SB1 originally came with a different screen, which was later > updated to the same one as is now used in the SB2/3. This is not quite true. The SB1G did offer an upgraded graphical screen (280x16, no grayscale) but it's not anywhere near as good as those in the sb2/3/transporter (320x32, grayscale). I have an SB1g and it's nowhere near as pretty as my SB2. -- azinck3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ azinck3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3967 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32773 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
