> Bottom line was that Win2K took 40% > more time to scan than Ubuntu did, with a library of around 4000 > tracks.
As I could not believe these numbers I just did a test myself. SlimCD run in a virtual machine is scanning _faster_ than scanning the same collection over the net on the Windows host itself... I would never have expected such a difference! -- Michael ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.herger.net/SlimCD - your SlimServer on a CD http://www.herger.net/slim - AlbumReview, Biography, MusicInfoSCR _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
