ModelCitizen wrote:
> Peter;279910 Wrote: 
>   
>> You have a PC dedicated for this stuff? What PC, bought in the last 5
>> years, is incapable of running  SoftSqueeze/Java and Squeezecenter
>> simultaneously?
>>     
> No I don't. I have one PC (as stated above) that is always on. This is
> my deskop machine and a SlimCenter server. Of course, it is capable of
> running SoftSqueeze as is... it's just that it is entirely unnecessary
> for me to do that and it'll get in the way.
>   

I understood you had one PC that's always on and others that are not 
always on.

> Peter;279910 Wrote: 
>   
>> You're running Windows already, which means you're pretty much stuck
>> with the graphic interface.
>>     
> I was taking about the graphical interface of Softsqueeze.
> Peter;279910 Wrote: 
>   
>> VNC is a very minimal tool that allows you to control your 
>> headless/always on PC from a non-headless/not-always-on PC. You must
>> control the thing someway, right? Remote Desktop is fine as well of
>> course.
>>     
> I have used VNC for years at work, but it is not much use for me when I
> only have one PC at home! I think the confusion comes from my use of the
> word "headless". I was referring to using Softsqueeze in headless mode
> (See title "headless player"). I was hoping that this meant using it
> without any sort of graphical interface (and my doubt is illustrated by
> the way I phrased it as a question in the post). Sorry it wasn't clear.
> BTW. I now prefer to use Windows intergrated remote desktop (Terminal
> Server as was) in preference to VNC.
>   

That's it, I think we got confused about the headless issue. I thought 
there was some switch to run SoftSqueeze without the GUI, though... 
(still needs Java obviously) Try the -Dskins=headless
option.
> Peter;279910 Wrote: 
>   
>> I didn't say you had to learn it [Linux], just run it. You don't have
>> to be a Linux expert to run a few programs.
>>     
> I've tried to install various flavours of Linux at various times since
> I first dived into the world of Slimdevices. The result was always
> failure (even with Michael Herger's SlimCD). Setting up Linux and
> maintaining it is not a process without a certain time-cost. Anyway
> it's daft thing to have to run a minority OS solely to service one
> consumer-orientated software package.
>   
I'm not trying to push Linux on people who don't want or need it, but 
for a (headless) server it's hard to beat.

> Anyway. Thanks for your help.
>   

Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Peter

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to