aubuti;326613 Wrote: > Sorry, but that last statement simply has no basis whatsoever. Lots of > people run SC7.x on less than 512MB. I run SC with several plugins on a > basic consumer NAS with 128MB RAM, feeding up to 5 SBs. I have set up a > similar NAS for a friend. Before I got the NAS I was running SS on a > vintage desktop with 256MB. All run Linux that boot to text mode only. > Scanning and the SC web ui are slow but usable, but control via the > Duet Controller or IR remote is plenty snappy. > > Also, you can build/buy fanless low-noise low-energy-draw systems with > 1GB RAM and 1.2GHz or better processors.
Well plenty of people on the QNAP forum think it runs quite slow. And a TS-209Pro isn't that low quality, although it only has 128MB ram. For me the webinterface is now already quite slow, and that's on a 2.4GHz system with 1GB ram and SATA disks. I would expect software running on the same pc to feel snappy. Many websites on the 'net load faster than SC coming from the same PC. Apart from that, I see this discussion is going nowhere, but at least I've aired my frustrations about the software of this otherwise splendid hardware. And I have no ambition to start coding it myself, I am already scrambling to find the time to work on another open source project (see sig) -- Pétur Alternative free open source firmware for your mp3 player - http://www.rockbox.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pétur's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=363 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=50698
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
