On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:28:13AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > ... The one thing lost is a digital signature of the tag, but I'm > not sure why we want that anyway. It's not like end users are > constantly downloading a version and running their own Snowdrifts > (other than for development). Any thoughts, anybody?
For what it's worth, I just discovered one can tag merge commits. :)
$ git show --show-signature
commit 76b866544fe22be1f2f8dc1e1fe234a3ba72adf1
gpg: Signature made Fri 10 Jul 2015 10:14:19 AM PDT using RSA key ID
20068BFB
gpg: Good signature from "Bryan Richter <[email protected]>"
gpg: aka "Bryan Richter <[email protected]>"
gpg: aka "Bryan Richter <[email protected]>"
gpg: aka "Bryan Richter <[email protected]>"
Merge: 51d2ff6 839b3f2
Author: Bryan Richter <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Jul 10 10:13:17 2015 -0700
Merge branch 'avoid-delays-in-testsuite'
Conflicts:
SnowdriftEmailDaemon.hs
tests/TestImport.hs
Conflicts were primarily about switching to using stack to run
executables.
...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss
