On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bryan Richter <b...@chreekat.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:04:33AM -0700, Jonathan Roberts wrote: > > > > Paying a member fee is an interesting thought. I guess I hadn't > > considered that. I have been mostly thinking that it makes sense > > to give full time staff, payed or not, special representation on > > the board. In other words, I'm not sure I want a possibility for > > someone to be able to just "buy in" to that class, whatever we > > call it. > > I see your point. So the question is, who is being represented? What > is a "full-time staff"? > > I agree with Aaron: trying to create metrics or algorithms for > deciding such a thing sounds dicey to me. > > Would it help to ask what sort of needs they might have that would > make them distinct? That is, is "full-time staff" truly a valid > category, and if so, can we define them by their unique interests? > I think these questions are helpful, and are along the lines I've been thinking. Issues related to getting payed for work are a pretty easy to define set of unique interests. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.snowdrift.coop > https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss
